I’ve had this strange fascination towards Bertrand Russell, who is known for his analytic philosophy and utter brilliance in his Principia Mathematica. Kelly James Clark, in his Return to Reason, quotes some Bertrand Russell to characterize the essential thrust to the evidentialist objection to belief in God.

God and immortality, the central dogmas of the Christian religion, find no support in science… No doubt people will continue to entertain these beliefs, because they are pleasant, just as it is pleasant to think ourselves virtuous and our enemies wicked. But for my part I cannot see any ground for either. I do not pretend to be able to prove that there is no God. I equally cannot prove that Satan is a fiction. The Christian God may exist; so may the Gods of Olympus, or of ancient Egypt, or of Babylon. But no one of these hypotheses is more probable than any other: they lie outside the region of even probable knowledge, and therefore, there is no reason to consider any of them.